·Residents fighting to keep Vulcan Materials from turning a former ranch in central Comal County into a 1 500 acre open pit limestone quarry are asking the Texas Supreme Court to vacate a May lower court ruling that greenlights a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TCEQ air quality permit for a rock crusher This is not the end of
Recruitments Link to download admit card for practical trade skill test and interview Junior Court Attendant cooking knowing exam 2024; Listing Notices List of oral mentioning matters before Hon ble Courts on ; Listing Notices Advance List of Chamber Matters likely to be listed in the week commencing from to
·Sources said the NGT in its order also clarified that if any stone crusher was aggrieved by its order of fixing interim compensation it might be at liberty to move this tribunal but the owners
·Similar view has been taken by the Supreme Court in the case of Beena v Ramachandra Rao26 The Supreme Court has held that the licensee gets a permission for a particular purpose or in a particular manner but for the permission so given the occupation would have been unlawful 72
The petitioner has also sought a direction to respondent to 3 to allow him to operate his stone crusher in view of 60 dated 23rd of February 2021 whereby the Jammu and Kashmir Stone Crushers/Hot and Wet Mixing Plants Regulation Rules 2021 have been promulgated In paragraph 20 of A K Kraipak supra the Supreme Court held
·In this petition the petitioner inter alia seeks writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to collect the tax from the petitioner for private land/road where the stone crusher has been installed and to collect the toll tax as per Section 4 of Levy of Toll Tax Act read with Section 2 i of Levy of Toll Rules from the post where the
·The Enforcement Directorate ED today said it has arrested Lakhwinder Singh the alleged mastermind of illegal mining in the Una district of Himachal Pradesh under provisions of the Prevention of
Jammu & Kashmir High Court M/S Upkar Stone Crusher vs Ut Of J&K & Ors on 4 June 2021 Author Sanjeev Kumar In paragraph 20 of A K Kraipak supra the Supreme Court held thus "20 The aim of the rules of natural justice is to secure justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of justice These rules can operate only in areas
· 1 The order passed in writ petition no 5768/2008 m/s anu stone crusher v Bank of india and others will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no 5770/2008 M/s Bajaj Stone Crusher v Bank of India and others and writ petition no 5781/2008 m/s Saroj stone crusher v Bank of india and others
·in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the 11 th day of august 2021 present the hon ble s oka chief justice and the hon ble gowda writ petition no 14454 of 2021 gm mm s between janapriya stone crusher a partnership firm at no 476 yelagalahalli village mandikal hobli
Jammu & Kashmir High Court M/S Khushi Stone Crusher vs Ut Of J&K & Ors on 4 June 2021 Author Sanjeev Kumar In paragraph 20 of A K Kraipak supra the Supreme Court held thus "20 The aim of the rules of natural justice is to secure justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of justice These rules can operate only in areas
·O R D E R 1 The grievance of the appellants is that the impugned order of the National Green Tribunal 1 dated 12 April 2022 issuing an ad interim direction that the stone crushers shall not be permitted to operate in the absence of requisite pollution prevention and control systems was passed without hearing the 2 The
Supreme®/Stone Island® Corduroy Crusher 1135 542 Release 19th November 20 Week 13 Season fall winter 2020 Water repellent cotton corduroy 500 crusher with cotton cord closure and leather cord stopper Adjustable nylon webbing strap at back and embroidered logos at front Made exclusively for Supreme prices / retails
·No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15 1992 onward 3 The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall
·Supreme Court Daily Orders State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 July 2017 Bench Sikri Ashok Bhushan 1 ITEM COURT SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition s for Special Leave to Appeal C No s
The petitioner has also sought a direction to respondent to 3 to allow him to operate his stone crusher in view of 60 dated 23rd of February 2021 whereby the Jammu and Kashmir Stone Crushers/Hot and Wet Mixing Plants Regulation Rules 2021 have been promulgated In paragraph 20 of A K Kraipak supra the Supreme Court held
·In a decision replete with financial consequences for mining companies the Supreme Court SC on Wednesday gave limited retrospective effect to its recent judgment upholding the power of states to levy tax on mineral rights and mineral bearing land allowing them to collect tax arrears from April 1 2005 onwards but without any
·It is brought to the notice of this Court that the controversy which is a subject matter of the present appeals is covered by the judgment of the Court State of Uttarakhand and Others vs Kumaon Stone Crusher [ 2018 14 SCC 537] As a result of that judgment the impugned order has been in effect upheld 2
·Supreme has worked with Stone Island® on a new collection for Fall 2020 Made exclusively for Supreme the collection consists of a hand painted Hooded Shearling Jacket; water and wind resistant painted camo Crinkle Down Jacket nylon Cargo Pant cotton Top nylon Shoulder Bag and nylon 6 Panel; cotton corduroy Jacket Pant
·In a big setback for mining operators the Supreme Court on Monday upheld that states can levy royalties on the extraction of minerals and clarified that this ruling will also apply
·The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v State Of 4386 This case relates to the petitioner herein himself