·Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of stone crusher licence after the environment pollution report is submitted and after adjudication of the matter before learned Lokayuktha regarding the explosion which took place on at
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Basic Structure Judgment; Webcast; Multimedia; Photo Gallery; Publications Supreme Court Chronicle; Dr Ambedkar; Courts of India; Court News; Annual Reports; M/S KSG STONE CRUSHER VS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Diary Number 45022 / 2024 04 Oct 2024
·ISLAMABAD The Supreme Court on Thursday banned on immediate basis stone crushing at Margalla Hills and directed the government of Punjab as well as Khyber Pukhtunkhwa to take speedy
PER SETHI JUDICIAL MEMBER The assessee is in appeal against the order dated passed by the learned Commissioner of Income tax Appeals in the matter of an assessment made under 3 of the Income tax Act 1961 the Act by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2005 06
Stone Crusher units which are in the aforesaid prohibited limits shall shift to other areas within six months from the date of publication of this notification in the Orissa Gazette 3 It has been stated at the Bar that the issue involved herein has been considered by the Division Bench of this Court in Shree
·In a decision replete with financial consequences for mining companies the Supreme Court SC on Wednesday gave limited retrospective effect to its recent judgment upholding the power of states to levy tax on mineral rights and mineral bearing land allowing them to collect tax arrears from April 1 2005 onwards but without any
·The captioned petition is filed in the nature of writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 20th/21st June 2018 Annexure D issued in Form D by the second respondent and also to quash the order dated 6th February 2020 Annexure J passed by the fifth respondent or in the alternative to quash the endorsement dated 9th August 2018
·JUDGMENT Mr Adarsh Bhagat GA for R 1 1 The petitioners claim to be involved in the business of stone crushing under the valid permission granted by the authorities concerned and are aggrieved of the Government order bearing No 1018 JK GAD of 2020 dated whereby the respondent No 1 has accorded sanction to
·IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition M/S No 1767 of 2017 M/S Sidhbali Stone Crusher & othersPetitioners State of Uttarakhand & With Writ Petition M/S No 433 of 2017 Ajeet Stone IndustriesPetitioner Union of India & OthersRespondents Ms Sheetal Advocate
Also Read Supreme Court Judgment on Suretech Hospital Medical Negligence Case A Tale of Negligence and Unnecessary Risk Taking Decision Respondent no 4 and 4A are directed to submit an undertaking to shift their stone crushing units outside the residential area by 30th November 2018
·3 The matter pertains to two stone crushers operated by the respondent nos 4 and 5 in Village Fatta Bangar at Haldwani in Nainital District The contention of the appellant based on the report dated 7th April 2014 of the Halka Patwari is that the two stone crusher units are operating in violation of the statutory environmental
4 6 Therefore all these writ petitions are allowed directing the Land Acquisition Officer / Revenue Divisional Officer to refer the matters separately as individual reference under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act 2013 to the LARR authority within a period of three 3 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
·Neutral Citation No 2023 AHC 167336 DB Court No 3 Case WRIT C No 25003 of 2023 Petitioner Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company Respondent State of and Another Counsel for Petitioner Udit Chandra Nitesh Patel Counsel for Respondent CSC
·The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v State Of 4386 This case relates to the petitioner herein himself
·Initially the petitioners filed the writ petition on seeking besides other prayers to command the official respondents to restrain the private respondent from operating the stone crusher and extracting stones from the nallah bed which petition later on came to be registered as a Public Interest Litigation vide order
·Stone Crusher units which are in the aforesaid prohibited limits shall shift to other areas within six months from the date of publication of this notification in the Orissa Gazette As such all the Stone Crusher units operating in the State of Orissa are requested to comply the directions in the stipulated time latest by
·By impugned judgment and Order dated the High Court has allowed the Writ Petition by quashing the cut off date on the ground that no reasons were forthcoming from the appellant Corporation for picking up the cut off date for implementation of Pension Scheme Further High Court has declared that the Scheme
Get free access to the complete judgment in PEOPLES RIGHTS AND SOCIAL RESEARCH CENTRE PRASAR v UNION OF INDIA on CaseMine has focused on occupational health particularly for stone crusher stone quarry and construction workers The Supreme Court determined that the National Green Tribunal NGT is the appropriate
Also the stone crusher has provided a water fogger system in the premises of the stone crusher During the Committee member s; visit on 08/09/2021 the said stone crusher was not in operation However committee members found that the water sprinkler and fogger systems were in operation
The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be obiter dicta since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process Therefore there is no merit in the contention of the Revenue Accordingly all the questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue 19
·among the residents and the workers of the stone crushing plants See Schedule B of the Order for details 3 Thereafter not satisfied with the performance of the power crushers and in order to delve deeper into the issue of environmental degradation in the area this Court vide Order dated was
·Get free access to the complete judgment in GAURAV STONE CRUSHER THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR v STATE OF HARYANA on CaseMine
We provide customers with a variety of high-quality crushing equipment, sand making equipment, mobile crushers, and optimize the combination of various models of equipment to meet different process requirements.
Copyright © 2024 SHBM Stone Crushing Equipment Manufacturer
